Making Bad Decisions? Cognitive Biases May Be To Blame
Interesting for Implications Wheel Facilitators — and a good question: Cognitive Biases – Paradigms?
Interesting for Implications Wheel Facilitators — and a good question: Cognitive Biases – Paradigms?
Relevant to any discussion of Mission — Purpose — Vision Article Link
Yuval Harari, author of Homo Deus, at the World Economic Forum Video Link
There’s a very interesting connection in the key points of this article and the measurement/scoring aspects of the Strategy Matrix. This is worth exploring in more detail. Article Link
Such high-stakes, high-pressure situations bring into stark relief the reality that decisions must often be made with incomplete, sometimes conflicting information. A leader has to evaluate whether he or she has enough information to move forward. Decide too soon and …
It’s valuable to connect this article to how the Implications Wheel handles conflict and diversity of input.
This is a very broad overview but it actually contains some clearly identified “implications” in three different categories.
This post distinguishes management, strategic planning and foresight. It suggests how the “long view” and global perspective of futurists, which is at the core of foresight, also benefits management and strategic planning.
This is clearly about monitoring and sharing key information. The T.I.P.S. Tracking process involves a collaborative approach to this important idea.
This book, co-authored by Implications Wheel Facilitator Hayim Herring with a chapter contributed by Jim Schreier, is gathering great reviews like this one, is on Exploring the Future and contains references to both the Implications Wheel, with an example, and …